Rebuilding Soraya Station: A Journey into Sumatra Conservation


, , , , , , , , ,

Cub Gear Above

Equipment and supplies donated by the Rare Species Fund to the Soraya Station

Written by Dr. Robert Johnson, Chief Operating Officer, International Operations, Rare Species Fund

I have spent more than a decade helping conduct in situ conservation projects for the Rare Species Fund (RSF) across the world. Collectively, I’ve spent more than a year in the field in both Africa and Asia, delivering equipment and collaborating with grass-roots conservation groups in biological hotspots, to help protect some of the world’s most recognizable endangered species and the environments they inhabit. While I am proud of the work being done by all our conservation partners, I was in awe with the sheer scale, effectiveness and dedication I witnessed during a recent trip to the Leuser ecosystem in Sumatra.

Leuser is a system of forests situated on the northern side of the Indonesian island of Sumatra. Approximately 9 million hectares in size, this forest is the only place in the world that is home to tigers, orangutans, rhinos and elephants. This territory is also shared by sun bears and endangered lesser cat species, as well as numerous monkeys, birds, butterflies and plants that can be found nowhere else in the world. Leuser was designated as a national forest by the Indonesian government. Similar to protected lands in the United States, National Parks are monitored and patrolled by government employed rangers, but National Forests, while “officially” protected, are, on a daily basis, left largely unmonitored by government officials. The same is true for Leuser. The massive expanses of forest are “by law” protected from hunting and timber cutting, but enforcement is typically lacking. As in the U.S., this is primarily a result of too few government rangers to patrol such vast expanses of forests. They must concentrate their efforts in smaller areas, typically the national parks.


Rudi Putra, Director Soraya Station

In Sumatra, this gap in wildlife protection is being addressed by the Forum Konservasi Leuser (FKL). The organization’s founder, Rudi Putra, has taken on the responsibility of protecting the endangered wildlife of this vast area. Rudi is not just an active participant, he is the driving force behind FKL and its mission. Winner of the Goldman Conservation Award, Rudi Putra is internationally recognized for his conservation efforts in the Leuser Ecosystem.

My first personal contact with Rudi happened on Sumatra. The Rare Species Fund paid for the rebuilding of the Soraya Research Station, an essential outpost in conserving the southern Leuser forests. Having invested substantial funding in this project, RSF decided that I should travel as their representative to inspect the work that we have financed and to get a better idea of how the Rare Species Fund could continue supporting FKL and their mission.

I was met in Medan (Sumatra’s largest city) by Rudi. Traveling to Soraya Station would not be an easy journey. Driving to the Medan Airport, we boarded a Cessna Caravan for a flight to the remote city of Tapak Tuan. I learned that while the aircraft only held 12 passengers, the flight still only took place two times per week, and sometimes, not even then. Upon arrival in Tapak Tuan, we were met by other members of the FKL team. After going through the greetings and salutations customary in the Aceh culture, we climbed into a small SUV and headed south for several hours, along the Indian Ocean, to a small village situated on the southern bank of the Alas River.

As the small village would be the last contact with the outside world for a week, we did a small amount of shopping. I knew things were going to be different when we walked into a small hardware store and Rudi asked me to try on a pair of rubber soccer cleat style shoes. As an average size American male, I have a shoe size of 9.5. By Indonesian standards, my feet are very large. A half size smaller was the largest shoe the small store carried. Luckily, without socks, the shoes were snug, but not uncomfortable. With the purchase of a new pair of shoes under my arm, we headed back to the vehicle and began unloading gear along the riverside. Rudi suggested that I change into the rubber shoes and leave the shoes I’d arrived in with the vehicle. I’d get them back in a week.

Our group of eight walked down the riverside where two small handmade wooden boats awaited us. The current in the river was ripping past as we climbed down the embankment and precariously walked over a small wooden plank and situated the gear and ourselves on the floor of the 20 foot long, 3.5 foot wide vessel. Leaning too far in either direction would undoubtedly result in a wet day for everyone involved, so I balanced myself in the exact center as best I could, and we pushed away from the landing. The boat engine looked like a small pull-start generator sitting on the floor of the boat. Connected to the aft side of the engine was a drive-shaft which ran backwards through a hole in the floor and was mounted with a small two-bladed propeller. While I appreciate the ingenuity of working with materials at hand, the boat, particularly the drive-shaft hole, were far from waterproof. Bailing water from the boat with an empty plastic jug was a regular ritual.

We traveled up the river for almost two hours. The long, slender boat glided smoothly over the swift moving waters of the Alas River. The pilot navigated the quick, tippy vessel from one side of the river to the next, circling around small islands, under low hanging trees, and avoiding the worst of the turbulent currents.

The first thing that struck me about the riverine environment was the constant amount of human development along the river’s edge. As we moved further away from the village and deeper into the Leuser Forest, the mountains grew steeper and the vegetation thicker. Still, mile after mile, the river banks were lined with small farms. Where there had once been prime wildlife habitat, there were now row after row, hill after hill, of palm oil trees.

Many miles up the river and deep into the forest, we came to a section of the river with a small tributary running into the main channel. The river was turbulent, and the water rolled tumultuously at the confluence of these two quick moving bodies of water. The boat was steered into the small creek which appeared almost swallowed by the jungle. We ducked under fallen trees as the boat chugged deeper into the forest. About two hundred yards in, the boat wedged itself against a tree on the left bank, the unofficial landing site of Soraya Station. The forwardmost passenger jumped out and tied the boat to a root. We delicately balanced ourselves as we walked the length of the boat, as to not tip over, and jumped onto the bank. Stepping off and plopping squishily onto the muddy bank, the purpose of the rubber shoes was immediately evident. Any normal pair of “street” shoes would never look the same after one day in this forest.


Delivering equipment from RSF to Soraya Station

The large duffel bags of conservation gear I brought for the rangers, as well as supplies for the station, were offloaded onto the low lying swampy bank. They were carried along a foot path, up the side of a precariously steep and slippery mountain path towards the top of the jungle covered plateau. We stopped along the way several times for a break. About half way up the climb, a series of ropes were strung from tree to tree to aid in climbing and help prevent slipping on the wet, muddy rocks. It occurred to me that if such a precaution was erected for these hardcore Sumatran rangers to use, it must REALLY be necessary.

 Reaching the top of the climb and making our way through the primeval forest, we crossed a quick moving mountain stream (again, the necessity of the rubber shoes was clear), to find the Soraya Research Station standing in a small clearing on the opposite bank. My first impression upon seeing the building, after marveling at such a structure in this remote location, was to wonder how much work it must have been just to transport the construction materials to this point.


Newly rebuilt Soraya Station

The Soraya Research Station could be considered fairly comfortable even by western standards. Along with a large central room, there are three private bedrooms, a very spacious kitchen, two bathrooms (with western and eastern toilets), a covered back porch and a covered and elevated front porch. Each restroom has a single water spigot to fill a large bucket. Like most Indonesian lavatories, the toilets are flushed by ladling water from the bucket into the bowl. Even this might be considered “basic” by most readers, the fact that a building such as this, in such a remote location, has any form of running water is remarkable. I have been told by a number of rangers and international researchers during my time in Sumatra that the Soraya Research Station is larger, cleaner and provides more comforts than perhaps any other research station on the island, a point that I feel the Rare Species Fund should be proud of.

The station itself is perched on the top of the plateau, surrounded by jungle. About fifty yards in front of the building is the stream we had to cross to reach the station. Immediately downstream, the water flows over a spectacular 100’ tall waterfall, and then eventually to the boat landing site and on to the main channel of the river. Several hundred yards behind the station is another stream and another spectacular 100’ waterfall. The sounds of cicadas, forest creatures and two waterfalls in very close proximity made for a very soothing and calming environment. Drifting off to sleep was never a problem while staying at Soraya.

Upon arrival at the building, I met additional FKL rangers and researchers. I also learned a bit more about the station’s tumultuous history. Apparently, the original Soraya Research Station, which was located exactly where the new station is built, was an outpost for rangers and researchers alike. In 1976, a civil war broke out in the Aceh region of Sumatra. A group of locals believed that their cultural and religious interests were not being represented or acknowledged by the Indonesian government. Due to a large number of ideological and theological differences, the group wanted to succeed from Indonesia and become their own country. This was not looked at favorably by Indonesian government officials in the country’s capitol of Jakarta, on the neighboring island Java. A small scale civil war broke out, which would plague the Aceh region for nearly 3 decades.

During the fighting, in 2001, the Soraya station was burned to the ground. The only remaining bits of the structure were the concrete supports. It is still not clear which side was responsible for destroying the building, but it is clear that the rangers and researchers no longer had an outpost in the region. A treaty between the two warring sides was reached in 2005. Nevertheless, fifteen years passed without a regular presence of wildlife rangers or researchers in southern Leuser, because they had no permanent camp to work from. Lack of official presence in the forest led to a massive increase of poaching, illegal logging and the encroachment of palm oil farms into the forest.

In 2016, the Rare Species Fund began its collaboration with FKL in helping to reestablish the Soraya Research Station. Since that time, funding has allowed the station to be built bigger and better than it originally had been. The regular presence of rangers on patrol has since reduced the amount of poaching by 90%. Snare after snare has been removed and destroyed by the team. Rudi explained that FKL currently has 23 teams of “Wildlife Protection” rangers. Each team consists of 5 people, 4 rangers from FKL, and one from the Indonesian Forest Ministry. The government ranger reports back to the ministry about the activities and successes of FKL and, since FKL members are private individuals, the Forest Ministry ranger must be present for the arrest of any poacher.


Soraya Rangers inspecting new equipment

Meeting and interacting with the rangers during my week in Leuser gave me a greater appreciation of the dedication these individuals have for saving wildlife. Even more, an appreciation that at least some local individuals are taking the protection of their own native wildlife and ecosystem so seriously. I expressed my sincere appreciation of their efforts, not only on behalf of the Rare Species Fund, but on behalf of the world at large. The individual animals they are protecting are some of the last of their species. While most of us sit at home, wishing there was some way we could directly save wild tigers and rhinos, these rangers are out there every single day doing the job for us. Finding grass-roots projects in which locals are so keen to make an environmental difference is what we are looking for. These are the reasons that prompt the RSF to extend a helping hand and provide the finances and resources to help these people complete their very important goals.

After the destruction of the original Soraya Station, the number of international researchers studying the area declined drastically. The rebuilding of the station offered promise of new research to be conducted in Soraya. The research will contribute to our understanding of wildlife and the environment, hopefully leading us to better methods of protecting them. During my visit, I met Professor Justin Agostino from Southern Illinois University. Justin is a primatologist and, while I was there, became the first foreign researcher to obtain a permit to study in the new Soraya Research Station. Spending several days with Justin, I was happy to hear his remarks about the new station. The access to the forest and the amenities provided by the new station surpassed his experience of other research stations in Sumatra. Justin expressed his admiration for the effort the Rare Species Fund had taken to rebuild the station, giving researchers like him a place to study apes in their natural environment. Justin’s research on wild siamang populations will likely give us a better understanding of how human activities affect wild ape behavior.

After a tour of the new station and introductions had been made, I was invited to join Rudi and the rangers for a walk through the forest. One of the first activities the rangers had undertaken was the reestablishment of a trail system to access the forest around the station. Currently there are more than 10 km of trails. The creation of a trail system means easier access to various parts of the forest. Without them, every ranger or researcher entering the forest would need to blaze their own trail. It has minimized the need for unnecessarily cutting vegetation and minimizing the human impact on the environment.


Dr. Robert Johnson, Rare Species Fund

The several-hour walk gave me an opportunity to experience firsthand the type of environment that is home to so many amazing animals under such immediate threat. Hearing the sounds of an unspoiled jungle, watching hornbills fly along the forest canopy of a distant mountain and finding constant evidence of the presence of orangutans really gave me insight into how really special the Leuser ecosystem is. The team showed me different plants and fruits and explained how they are important to different animal species in the forest. We found feathers of exotic birds and numerous orangutan nests as we explored both the highlands and swamps. Because of the constant presence of rangers in the area, since the rebuilding of the station, I am happy to say that we found no signs of illegal human activity, something that was unfortunately not the case when we later conducted a more extended patrol upriver.

As magical as it is to be in a forest such as Leuser, not all of the creatures are a delight to encounter. I discovered that leeches in Indonesia live in the forests. Most of us envision water as the place to avoid leeches. On Sumatra, the leeches are ground dwelling. They look like inchworms and crawl along the ground and low hanging branches with a form of locomotion called “looping”. The leeches have five pairs of eyes, a sucker on both ends of their bodies and three jaws with which to attach themselves to their host. Perhaps most disconcerting is that they sense their environment by waving their heads around and actively pursue you. While most attached leeches I found were around my ankles, I also found one under my shirt and one on the back of my neck. The first hike in the forest alone yielded 17 leeches attached to me. While most of us might find this a bit “creepy”, it is an inconvenience that you must face in order to visit such an environment.

At a particularly scenic overlook, we paused for a break. We watched birds flying in the distance and listened to the absolute symphony of forests sounds which makes up the constant auditory background of any visit to an Indonesian Jungle. Rudi reflected on the state of the forest. “Hornbills,” a large billed, heavy bodied bird of Africa and Asia, “are disappearing,” he told me. Apparently, a recent trend in using the beaks of these birds for Chinese folk medicine has escalated the rate at which they are being poached.

Rudi told me of his memories as a child, going to the river where the water was clean, and he could easily catch and bring back large fish for his family. Since the conversion of so much forest land to palm oil agriculture, the fragile layers of top soil have been eroding into the river. This has destabilized the banks of many rivers, diverted the natural flow of water and has resulted in never-before-seen catastrophic flooding, which has claimed the lives of many people and caused hundreds of millions of dollars in property damage. The fish too have disappeared. Instead of plentiful large fish in the river, the fish are small and scarce. The amount of plastic trash in the river was shocking to me. As the current sweeps by, refuse collects in the riverside plants. It was not uncommon to find a tree branch drooping in the water with literally hundreds of pieces of trash stuck to it. Rudi explained that the city of Blangkejeren was far upstream. Residents dumping their waste into the river is common practice and no one stops to consider where the debris ends up or what long term effects it may have. To have the last wild home of Sumatran tigers and rhinos so disregarded by local people was very disheartening. Knowing that Rudi and the FKL team are actively working to protect the area greatly takes away from the sting of disappointment in humanity. As the sky dimmed, we walked back through the forest in relative silence.

Back at camp and “de-leech-ified”, we started to settle in for the night. A small outbuilding used for drying clothes also housed a small electric generator. The machine was switched on for two hours in the evening. This provides light and electricity for the station and allows inhabitants to recharge gear needed for the next day’s work. Under the glow of electric lights, the team assembled inside building to examine the two large military duffel bags of gear I had brought for them.

At this point, I think it’s worthy of noting the complexities involved with transporting a couple hundred pounds of excess luggage across the world. First, the equipment delivered to Soraya traveled on five different flights, from Myrtle Beach to New York, to Johannesburg, to Dubai, to Jakarta, to Sumatra. Having so many large and unusual bags (one containing a chainsaw), the additional security screening is time consuming and often requires visual inspection and repacking. In Dubai, I was detained because I was carrying quite a few sets of binoculars. Upon scanning, security agents saw the large cylindrical tubes with lenses and thought that I might be transporting rifle scopes, which is prohibited in many countries. They eventually let me go.

Excess luggage means extra money. This is largely dependent on the airline you are flying and how generous the airline agent is feeling at the time. I paid anywhere from $50 – $250 for each excess bag per flight. Just maneuvering such a large accompaniment of baggage through busy airports is a challenge. Elevators, stairs and even standing in line poses a challenge.

Arriving in Jakarta, my port of entry for Indonesia, I had to clear customs. Typically, a person is required to pay an import tax on goods brought into the country in excess of $250. Having thousands of dollars of goods with me, the potential import duty would be substantial. Luckily, Rudi requested that the Forest Ministry write a letter on my behalf, explaining how the goods were to be used and how they would be directly benefiting the wildlife of the country. After reviewing my documents and x-raying my bags, I was granted official entrance into the country of Indonesia.

My flight from Jakarta to Medan, Sumatra proved to be more of the same, trying to negotiate excess luggage fees without needing to pay for an extra seat (which I sometimes have to do). Arriving in Medan, I met with Rudi at the airport, at which point, the bags were put on an overnight truck which would meet us in Tapak Tuan, on the other side of the island, the following day. From there, the gear followed me on the same half day SUV and boat rides to Soraya Station. While the cost and hassle involved to transport equipment may seem excessive, the reality of sending the bags ahead with DHL or the like tends to be even more expensive and problematic. The likelihood that the gear would arrive to the destination on time (not be delayed in transit or be held up in customs for months), and not have been rifled through, is unfortunately very low. The process is questionable and expensive at best. Purchasing the equipment in country is also very complicated. Even if we provided money directly to the rangers, their immediate access to quality goods pales in comparison to what we can order overnight from a single click of a smart phone. Carrying the equipment across the world, while tedious, still seems the best way to go.

(. . . . And now back to unpacking the gear at Soraya Station. . . .)

Just after dark, the FKL team had assembled inside Soraya Station, the generator quietly humming outside. Unzipping the bags, we dug through and pulled out a large amount of carefully chosen and packed gear. Among the list of equipment were Columbia raincoats and pants, tents, sleeping bags, sleeping mats, wrist watches, binoculars, compasses, a GPS unit, lighted hats, pocket knives, canteens, cameras, military backpacks, camera traps, memory cards, batteries, a DJI drone and, yes, even a chainsaw. Most of the equipment would allow the rangers to conduct their work much more comfortably and effectively. Items like the rain gear and hats would keep them dry in an environment that rainstorms for frequent and persistent. Canteens allow rangers to carry extra water. Wristwatches (which many rangers don’t have) allow team members to coordinate movements through the forest. Cameras allow them to document events in the forest. Compasses and GPS aid in navigation. The drone (which I taught 5 team members to fly) would be used to monitor the forest from above to detect deforestation and take photos and video which can be compared over time. The camera traps (our delivery doubled the total number of camera traps the organization has) can be placed in key locations in the forest to monitor both wildlife and illegal activities. The chainsaw, an item Rudi requested, would be used in the downing of palm oil trees in areas that would be converted back to jungle habitat. All in all, the delivery of equipment was well received, and the rangers were very grateful for the support. Not only will this equipment provide many years of use to these dedicated individuals, the fact that an organization like the Rare Species Fund knows of their efforts, and would be willing to go to such lengths to provide them with necessary equipment, is an absolute boost in morale amongst the rangers.

After a long first day in Soraya, a group of us sat on the front porch, drinking Sumatran coffee and eating local fruits. Talking and discussing the part that Soraya Research Station is playing in the conservation of endangered wildlife, I started comprehending what a world class group of people I was surrounded by.

I have already mentioned Justin Agostino and his research efforts.

I learned that Ibrahim, one of the older men amongst the ranks at Soraya, has spent 31 years working in the forest. A botanist by training, Ibrahim is known as “the Professor” and guides many international researchers through the forest to study the flora and fauna. Ibrahim was guiding Dr. Carel van Schaik, a renowned Dutch anthropologist, during his historic first discovery of orangutans using tools. Ibrahim’s knowledge of the forest is unparalleled. His understanding of the trees and vines and flowers of the area is a virtual compendium. The man is a walking library of knowledge. He is currently teaching his son, and others, this information so it does not get lost to the passage of time.

One of the head patrol rangers, sitting at the table with me, is a man nicknamed “Turbo”, because of the speed at which he can travel through the forest. Turbo was a general in the Aceh liberation army and fought to separate Aceh from the rest of Indonesia. He spent seven years hiding and fighting a guerilla war in the jungle. The skills he has developed to track and survive in the jungle has made Turbo the perfect candidate for anti-poaching patrols and looking for signs of human encroachment. Turbo admits he is happy that the insurrection is over, and a treaty has been signed. Not being able to return to civilization for seven years, while fighting a war, was not his idea of fun. Nonetheless, much of his time today is spent in the forests, protecting the animals and environment which he feels hid and protected him for so many years as a rebel.


Rudi Putra

We also must not forget Mr. Rudi Putra, the driving force behind FKL. Rudi is a man of few words and his visage appears more austere and introspective than most of the team. Perhaps this is because of his responsibility to the staff he employs in the name of wildlife conservation. Funding for the project is never a sure thing. Perhaps it is because the severity of the looming potential environmental disaster for Leuser is falling squarely on his shoulders.

Rudi does not laugh as much as most other FKL members, but his laughs are genuine and heartfelt.  His goal to succeed in protecting his local environment is relentless. Rudi has taken a small community project and has nurtured and grown FKL to include approximately 200 employees. Perhaps the reason Rudi takes the mission so seriously is that he believes that Leuser “is the last hope for Sumatran tigers, rhinos, elephants and orangutans.” Having visited much of northern Sumatra, I’m inclined to agree with him. Experiencing firsthand the scope and effectiveness of the work FKL is doing, I must say that I both respect and admire Rudi Putra and his team. Their dedication to saving the vanishing species of Sumatra is monumental and something that the Rare Species Fund is proud to be actively helping make happen.

Before I know it, it is time to retire for the night. As the generator is switched off and the lights dim, I climb under my mosquito net and mull over the experiences of the day. It is not long before my thoughts become infused with the sounds of waterfalls and cicadas and I drift off to sleep, mentally and physically recharging for another day in Leuser.

— Robert Johnson is a Ph.D. animal behaviorist, conducting research in improving zoo husbandry techniques based on species-specific behavior. Serving as adjunct professor at Coastal Carolina University, Robert teaches upper level biology courses about apex predators, including tigers, bears, and sharks. Robert has also been a long-time team member of the Rare Species Fund. Joining the organization in 1994, Robert has led the international operations as COO for the group for the past decade.

Animal Ambassadors: 21st Century Conservation


, , , , , , ,


Ramses the Cheetah is a star for Conservation

21st Century Conservation

I have spent more than 30 years of my life developing safe proven training programs for both handlers and animals. At TIGERS and the Rare Species Fund, we endorse an interactive approach to animal ambassadorship. Our highly structured program of intensive socialization, careful breeding and cutting edge enrichment ensures that well adjusted and happy animals become model citizens who are flourishing in a human environment. These captive-born animals will never be introduced into the wild. Understanding their species-specific needs and the employment of carefully designed, interactive husbandry techniques allows them to thrive in captivity. Scientific research has shown a myriad of benefits captive wildlife can experience through regular human interaction. Animals who have not had the opportunity to become comfortable and trusting in human interactions can become stressed, anxious, and possibly problematic in the execution of the simplest captive care and veterinary tasks. We are invested in training well socialized ambassadors, comfortable in their lives, to represent species that we are actively working to conserve in the wild.

Aerial (5)

Million dollar swimming and enrichment center at TIGERS

Untrained, unsocialized animals are stressed and fearful and don’t make good ambassadors. Only the most tractable and well trained animals become the Animal Ambassadors of TIGERS/RSF. Our ambassadors provide a window to a world that most Americans will never witness first hand. Our program creates a powerful experience that engenders the human-animal connection. People who feel connected to animals in a tangible way are much more likely to support conservation efforts in the wild. The TIGERS/RSF Animal Ambassador program has raised more than $1,000,000 for small on-the-ground conservation projects we support around the globe.

The Politics of Division
Unknown to many, the role of animal ambassadors has become a point of division within the zoological community. The reason for this split is the growing influence of animal rights behemoth, the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), over zoo policy at the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA), the largest zoological trade association in the U.S. The HSUS believes in a hands off approach, preferring captive animals behave as if wild. Ignoring the essential role that captive conservation programs play in combatting extinction, they believe that zoos should transition to the role of animal “sanctuaries”,  where the remaining captive animals would live out their lives until they die, completely eliminating AZA’s long standing Species Survival Plan (SSP) programs, and completely ignoring the success of multiple captive breeding programs of endangered species around the world. HSUS has been anti-zoo until just recently when they identified an opportunity to gain influence at AZA. HSUS advocates the elimination of all captive breeding projects, and wants all captive animals to be treated as wild (and expendable) animals, regardless of the inherent dangers potentially posed for handlers and the public.

Ironically, most of the accidents with big cats, lethal and otherwise, have occurred at AZA zoos that have adopted this “wild animals in captivity” model; most notably, San Francisco Zoo in 2007 when a tiger killed a patron and injured two others— and more recently, Palm Beach Zoo in 2016 when a tiger killed a zookeeper.

I attribute the perfect safety record here at TIGERS/RSF to the fact that we have evolved our zoological model to focus on socialization, training and rigorous enrichment opportunities, ensuring that our animals are healthy and happy in a “captive setting.” Why any institution would intentionally ignore an animal’s needs in captivity to the point where it is dangerous to feed, move or provide vet care, is incomprehensible. Yet this ignorant policy of isolation is exactly what HSUS is attempting to force on zoos across the country.


Hercules is the largest big cat in the world according to Guinness World Records

TIGERS/RSF Professional Handlers
At TIGERS/RSF we don’t have inexperienced keepers and interns caring for our animals as is routine at many AZA zoos. Our program of training professional handlers is unequaled in the zoo world. We receive hundreds of applications for our apprentice program every year, but only accept a very small handful of individuals. Those few that meet our exacting requirements commit to working 365 days a year, long hours, for a minimum of two years. There are no days off. Because developing hands-on, interactive relationships with animal ambassadors is a full-time commitment, apprentices work without expectation of days off or vacation. The first few years of training to be a TIGERS/RSF professional handler consist of doing non-animal-contact chores, all the while, observing the animal body language. Observing these behavioral nuances helps apprentices establish a foundation of true species understanding that later interaction may be built.

Working as a professional handler at TIGERS/RSF requires unwavering dedication and years of training. The lifestyle is rigorous and trainees are expected to maintain the physical standards of a professional athlete. Diet and regular exercise are mandatory. It takes five to ten years to become a novice trainer at TIGERS/RSF. Only this kind of dedication, discipline and training can produce a professional handler that is able to provide the type of consistency, understanding, and experience necessary to safely interact with Animal Ambassadors in a way that enriches the animals’ lives and brings the message of conservation to the public.

orang1Message of Conservation
Having been featured in popular media such as PBS and National Geographic documentaries, children’s books, music videos and feature films, our Animal ambassadors have attained celebrity status. Their high profile and charisma have inspired millions of Americans to take a greater interest in conserving rare and endangered species. Our handler training, unblemished safety record, and superior enrichment opportunities have set the stage for our animal ambassadors to happily, safely meet world conservation leaders, state legislators here in South Carolina, members of the public, and even members of the U.S. Congress. Wherever we go, the Animal Ambassadors of TIGERS/RSF carry the message of conservation to America.

Rare Species Fund (RSF)

The Institute of Greatly Endangered and Rare Species (TIGERS)

Watch this slow motion video of tigers running at full speed as part of the TIGERS/RSF Animal Ambassador enrichment program.

Big Cat Public Safety Act: USFWS v. USDA — The Last Word on Wildlife


Originally posted on The Last Word on Wildlife: UPDATED June 29, 2017 On March 30, 2017 the Big Cat Public Safety Act (H.R. 1818) was introduced into the U.S. House of Representatives. Proponents of H.R. 1818 laud it as a bi-partisan effort to “prohibit private ownership of captive lions, tigers, and other big cats in the US.”…

“Why is the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) teaming up with the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) to circumvent the Animal Welfare Act?” ~ Doc Antle

Read more via: Big Cat Public Safety Act: USFWS v. USDA — The Last Word on Wildlife

Big Cat Public Safety Act: Public Safety or Animal Rights?

Most of the accidents with big cats, lethal and otherwise, have occurred at AZA zoos that are exempted from this legislation; most notably, San Francisco Zoo in 2007 when a tiger killed a patron and injured two others— and most recently, Palm Beach Zoo in 2016 when a tiger killed a zookeeper.

Read more via Big Cat Public Safety Act: USFWS v. USDA — The Last Word on Wildlife

The Problem with Palm Oil: Sustainability


, , , , , , , ,

This is Part II of an article I wrote about palm oil in December 2015: Palm Oil: Heart of Darkness — Doc Antle

orang 34

Old Man of the Forest — ©Doc Antle 2012

A World on Fire
By now many have heard about the devastating effect slash and burn palm oil farming practices have had on the environment and charismatic wildlife in places like Borneo and Sumatra. Industrial farming interests have shown little regard for the flora and fauna of the region as they burn off vast swaths of land in preparation to produce cheap palm oil. Most visible of the suffering are the orangutans that have been driven from their homes by fire, with hundreds of young orangs orphaned when their mothers burned to death. But is this unsustainable model truly the future of palm oil production?

Orangutans at Risk
In 2012, the Rare Species Fund, traveled to Borneo to film a documentary about the life of the incomparable orangutan researcher, Dr. Biruté Mary Galdikas—Orangutan Foundation International. During our travels, we visited the orangutan orphanage, seeing hundreds of orphaned babies lamenting the loss of their mothers to fire as a tool used to clear land for palm oil plantations. The trauma these babies were experiencing was heart wrenching. And to realize, that this was once an incomparable eden filled with one of our closest living relatives; there are no words to describe the shock and depth of suffering we witnessed.

orang 8

Orphaned baby Orangutans at the field station run by Dr. Biruté Mary Galdikas — ©Doc Antle 2012

What is Palm Oil?
Palm oil is an edible plant oil which has become a common ingredient in many consumer products. It is the most widely consumed vegetable oil on the planet. According to the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), “palm oil is the world’s highest yielding oil crop, with an output 5–10 times greater per [acre] than other leading vegetable oils.” In other words, it’s efficient and cheap to produce. And everything from processed food and vitamins to lotion and lip balm— candy and candles— shampoo and toothpaste, all contain palm oil.

Is Palm Oil the Most Environmentally Responsible Choice?
In a word, yes. Palm Oil is really the only choice. Some may take issue with calling palm oil environmentally responsible, however the facts are indisputable:

  1. The world is overpopulated and demand for cheap vegetable oil is at an all-time high and continuing to grow.
  2. Palm oil is the world’s highest yielding oil crop, with an output 5–10 times greater per acre than other vegetable oils.
  3. Palm oil alternatives with poorer yields require greater acreage and resources to support similar production.

There is no question, palm oil is the best choice for sustainability because it requires less space and fewer resources to produce. It is very ecologically efficient. The sustainability problem is not with palm oil itself, but the slash and burn practices of current production models that have led to so much carnage of the natural world.

orang 36

Dr. Biruté Mary Galdikas — ©Doc Antle 2012

Boycotting Palm Oil Could Make the Problem Worse!
Even if boycotting palm oil proved successful (which it has not), it would only drive producers to alternative oils. Since the alternatives would destroy even more land and wildlife,  models of palm oil production that encourage responsibility and sustainability appear to be the answer. One thing is clear, avoiding palm oil or boycotting palm oil, has not worked, nor is it likely to work in the future. Orangutans, tigers and rhinos continue to die every day.

Sustainable Palm Oil Production
The WWF model of Certified Sustainable Palm Oil (CSPO), as outlined in their report entitled Profitability and Sustainability in Palm Oil Production, requires the certification of industrial farmers for best practices demanded by product producers. Ideally, the certification would ensure that the palm oil used is being grown in the most ecologically responsible way, and that land used to produce palm oil was not converted from land that was of High Conservation Value (HCV). The basis of this model is that product producers hold palm oil producers to a higher standard in the production of oil to be used in their products. The approach is consistent with certifications used in other industries such as seafood and organic farming.

The Palm Done Right model of sustainability combines fair trade principles with a certification process similar to the organic farming movement. It encourages small farmers to get involved with palm oil production by guaranteeing minimum market prices for certified growers, and providing education on best organic farming practices to increase production and yield on a smaller scale.

It remains to be seen whether the WWF or Palm Done Right model for sustainability will  ultimately work to reign in practices currently being used to produce palm oil. But at a minimum, these two sustainability models are moving the conversation forward toward the responsible production of this vital vegetable oil. It is a cold hard fact that the worlds population is increasing, and correspondingly, the demand for vegetable oil is also increasing. There is no evidence that this dynamic will change anytime soon. Since palm oil is the most efficient oil to produce, it will likely be the oil of choice for product producers for years to come. The only hope for orangutans and other creatures of the forest will be for sustainable practices to take hold in this industry before it’s too late.

In Borneo, the deforestation by fire was obscene. We tried to help more than 300 orphaned baby orangutans find refuge. — Doc Antle 2012

orang 28

The Rare Species Fund team, from left to right, Robert Johnson, Moksha Bybee and Doc Antle — ©Doc Antle 2012

Stop the Horror
Never before has such large scale industrial farming used such destructive slash and burn techniques to provide millions of consumers with everyday household products. Never before has there been such a raging firestorm engulfing high value biologically diverse habitat for critically endangered orangutans, tigers and rhinos. The homes for these charismatic creatures, and thousands of other plant and animal species, are being burned to the ground at a staggering pace. Although there is still hope of sustainably producing palm oil, without people like you taking action to demand sustainability, that hope is but a flicker on the path toward Armageddon. Are we already too late? Take action for Tigers, Orangutans and Rhinos today!

The Rare Species Fund is working closely with Biologist Rudi Putra to rebuild the Soraya Forest Research Station in Sumatra after it was burned to the ground by criminals. The fate of Sumatran orangutans, tigers and rhinos hang in the balance. The Rare Species Fund just sent Dr. Putra a check for $25,000 to continue his work. You can HELP! — Doc Antle

USDA Protects Captive Wildlife Stakeholders


, , , , , , , , , , ,

Aerial (5)

Million dollar swimming enrichment and interactive learning facility at TIGERS

HSUS Smear Campaign
Last month the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) attempted to smear the good name of TIGERS with lawmakers in South Carolina. They passed out a handout characterizing TIGERS as a “roadside zoo,” alleging “violations” of the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA), and citing “inspection reports” from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Well nothing could have been further from the truth. TIGERS has never had a violation of the AWA. And now USDA has taken steps to prevent animal rights activists from misusing their good work to defame legitimate stakeholders.

As some of you may know, there is a bill in the South Carolina legislature that seeks to regulate the ownership of big cats, non-native bears and great apes. It will require owners to have a USDA license or register their animals with local animal control. Last month, TIGERS attended a committee hearing on the bill at the House Agriculture Committee. During the hearing HSUS testified that they would like to see all primates added to the list of animals regulated, and further, they wanted all owners to be accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA), a private trade association that has the endorsement of HSUS with an agreement to promote HSUS ideology.

Intention to Deceive
After the hearing, the HSUS lobbyist gave the bill sponsor a handout that implied TIGERS was a sub-par “roadside zoo” with multiple “violations” of the AWA. As evidence, the handout cited USDA “inspection reports.” When the citations in the handout were followed, they didn’t lead to the USDA website, but to the website for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PeTA). PeTA, using the publicly available, pre-decisional reports that had been available on the USDA website, had created their own ideologically based interpretations designed to make stakeholders look like villains. The actual reports were quite benign, and amounted only to minor “non-compliance” issues that every zoo deals with every day.

A teachable moment is a minor non-compliant item that: 1) the facility is willing and able to correct quickly; 2) is not impacting the welfare of any animal(s); and 3) has not previously been cited. — USDA/APHIS, January 2016

There is a huge difference between a “non-compliance” issue, and a “violation.” These minor compliance issues are easily corrected prior to USDA follow up; facts conveniently omitted by PeTA, and happily exaggerated by HSUS to indict TIGERS for “violations.” Violations are serious, and constitute grounds for USDA to revoke a stakeholder’s license. Again, TIGERS has never had a violation of the Animal Welfare  Act.

TIGERS/ Myrtle Beach Safari
The Institute of Greatly Endangered and Rare Species (TIGERS) is one of the top wildlife preserves in the country. We are accredited by the Zoological Association of America and licensed, inspected and regulated by the USDA. Our facility is built outside of Myrtle Beach on 50 acres and houses approximately 100 animals. We have invested millions of dollars in a state-of-the-art, interactive facility that is unmatched anywhere in the country. Our investment in handler training, humane care, secure containment, and enrichment for our animal ambassadors, is far beyond what is required by the USDA. We are proud of the fact that we bring millions of tourist dollars into South Carolina every year.

Aerial (6)

Tree House and Rope Bridge at TIGERS

USDA Moves to Protect Stakeholders from Animal Rights Abuses
Because of abuses by HSUS, PeTA and other animal rights groups, the USDA has changed it’s policy about the types of information made available on their website.

USDA/APHIS is implementing actions to remove documents it posts on APHIS’ website involving the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) that contain personal information. These documents include inspection reports, research facility annual reports, regulatory correspondence, lists of regulated entities, and enforcement records (such as pre-litigation settlement agreements and administrative complaints) that have not received final adjudication.— USDA/APHIS, February 4, 2017

The USDA decision to provide some protection from the malicious characterizations of USDA  reports is supported by the Zoological Association of America (ZAA), the second largest zoological accrediting body in the United States.

For too long the Federal Government through the USDA has been violating the privacy of citizens with its acts of intrusion in the name of transparency. The USDA records availability were intended for use by animal welfare advocates to monitor government regulation of animals and the treatment of wild and domestic animals. However, this welfare information soon became the fuel and ammunition of animal rights activists in a smear campaign to discredit zoos and animal owners.— ZAA, February 9, 2017

HSUS/ PeTA Track Record
It is important to understand, that while groups like HSUS and PeTA portend to protect animals, their interest is purely ideological. The primary mission of most animal rights groups is to raise money using slick propaganda designed to tug at the heart strings of an animal loving American public. They are very good at this, but HSUS and PeTA are not in the business of caring for animals. The idea that with no practical experience they could analyze and interpret USDA reports without ever visiting a facility is preposterous.

Marketing materials showing abused dogs and cats suggest HSUS plays an active role in caring for homeless pets, however according to HSUS’ 2015 annual report, they took in over $194 million with less than 1% donated to animal shelters. They operate no animal shelters on their own. But HSUS did find enough in their budget to spend over $33 million on fundraising. Additionally, in 2014 HSUS and co-defendants were forced to pay almost $16 million to settle a Racketeering Lawsuit filed against them, after the judge discovered evidence of witness tampering and bribery by an HSUS subsidiary and their attorneys.

PeTA is just as bad, maybe even worse. According to a watchdog group, in 2009 PeTA “rescued” 2366 dogs and cats. 31 were transferred to other facilities. 8 were adopted out. 2,301 were killed at PeTA’s little shop of horrors in Norfolk, VA. That’s a kill rate of over 97%. PeTA’s idea of “rescue” appears to be euthanasia on a grand scale.

Thank You to the USDA/APHIS
It is a huge step for USDA to limit the ease with which animal rights groups abuse efforts at transparency. We consider USDA to be a crucial partner in creating an ever improving environment for our beloved animal ambassadors. With the help of USDA we bring the message of conservation of these magical creatures to thousands of people every year.


Doc Antle, Director of TIGERS and the Rare Species Fund

Don’t Touch the Tigers!


, , , , , ,


Animal trainers Doc and Kody Antle — ©Rare Species Fund

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) is considering a change of regulations that could jeopardize conservation efforts at TIGERS/RSF. In 2012 a group of radical animal rights groups, led by the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), petitioned USDA to “prohibit public contact with big cats, bears and non-human primates of any age.” USDA has accepted public comment, and will now decide the issue within the scope of the administrative “rule making” process. There will be no congressional vote nor oversight.

TIGERS/RSF Interactive Conservation
As most of you know, The Institute of Greatly Endangered and Rare Species (TIGERS) and the Rare Species Fund (RSF) facilitate the most cutting edge interactive wildlife experience in existence. We are located in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina and bring millions of dollars into the local economy annually. Over the last decade we have donated over $1,000,000 as well as our time, effort and expertise, to grassroots conservation programs around the world.

At our Preservation Stations, our wildlife ambassadors; great apes, big cats, elephant and a stunning group of other highly interactive animal ambassadors, offer our guests a collection of experiences that can be life changing. While at the preserves, the participants’ senses are awakened to a whole new world; feeling the leathery hide of our elephant, the soft touch of a lynx, the sweet smell of a binturong and the heart pounding sound of tigers running at 55 miles per hour.

Our visitors see animals they know and love displaying their spectacular natural talents and have encounters with new ones they never knew existed. During these encounters our guests connect with wildlife in a very intimate way, which personally involves them in the lives of these amazing animals. They then walk away into the world with a desire to save these creatures and help preserve their environments. We often hear the opposite from those in the animal rights arena; that these experiences do not have an impact on the desire of people to go out and be a more active part of wildlife conservation. However, we have seen first hand, and have spoken to countless individuals who have had these experiences that are now actively involved in conserving those species.

All of our encounter programs are conducted in accordance with USDA’s rules and policies under the Animal Welfare Act, and our highly trained staff ensure that visitor and animal safety is a priority at all times. We believe our programs are a testament to the fact that interactive encounters can be a safe, positive, and truly impactful experience for the public, as well as a stimulating and socializing event for our animal ambassadors themselves.

The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), the lead petitioner, and largest animal rights organization in the world, has become the bully of the animal welfare world. In 2014, HSUS and their subsidiary and co-petitioner, The Fund for Animals, along with Born Free USA (co-petitioner), settled a $15 million racketeering lawsuit filed against them by Feld Entertainment under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) after the court discovered the animal rights groups had paid a plaintiff for his participation in a related Endangered Species case, and then attempted to conceal those payments from the court. HSUS has since tried to distance themselves from their misdeeds by claiming that they inherited the lawsuit when they acquired The Fund for Animals, and therefore were not responsible for actions by the organization prior to acquisition. However, at the time of the acquisition, Wayne Pacelle, current CEO of HSUS, was the CEO of The Fund for Animals, and became CEO of HSUS in the wake of the acquisition. Pacelle is the primary signatory on the petition, and was the leader of The Fund for Animals when the transgression occurred, and the  RICO lawsuit was originally filed.

The petitioners not only mischaracterize animals welfare concerns in their petition, but they disparage all who don’t support their ideological goals. Further, several of the petitioners have recently expressed sentiments calling for an end to all zoos in the United States. Preferring that all zoo animals be transitioned into “last stop sanctuaries” until their deaths. With that course of action wildlife in zoos would become a thing of the past in about one generation.

USDA is currently assessing whether they will make an administrative change in the rules governing public contact. TIGERS/RSF understands that USDA is obligated to field all properly submitted petitions, but USDA is also bound to ascertain the credibility and motivations of the petitioners. In light of the philosophical bias exhibited by the petitioners, USDA should be careful not to allow powerful special interests to incrementally dismantle animal ambassador programs under the guise of animal welfare. It is clear that in an animal rights utopia, there are no animals in captivity for any reason. HSUS and their fellow petitioners seek to undermine conservation through manipulation of the Animal Welfare Act. With their recent record of transgressions under the RICO Act, USDA should question closely any information proffered by this unreliable source.

That Big Rise in Tiger Numbers? It Was a WWF Fantasy.

WWF appears to inflate tiger numbers for political expediency — Doc Antle

strange behaviors

(Photo: Jim Cook/Getty Images) (Photo: Jim Cook/Getty Images)

My latest for

Lately, media worldwide have been frothy with happy talk about an unexpected increase in populations of the endangered tiger, with the global count suddenly up from 3,200 to 3,890. The World Wildlife Fund and the Global Tiger Forum reported the result based on a tally of recent counts by government agencies and conservation groups.

The announcement predictably produced headlines everywhere that tiger populations were on the rise for the first time in 100 years. Even National Geographic and the BBC sang along, in tune: “Tiger Numbers Rise for First Time in a Century.”

There was only one problem: The news was a publicity-friendly confection of nonsense and wishful thinking, unsupported by any published science.

Instead, the timing of the announcement had everything to do with politics: It came the day before the scheduled opening of the Asia Ministerial Conference on Tiger…

View original post 797 more words